methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
A 5 Whys working surface connects an observable problem with evidenced causes, marked uncertainty and concrete countermeasures with ownership.
Operations
5 Whys
Paper illustration of Lean Startup with its method-specific working model.
Innovation
Lean Startup
Paper illustration for Pareto Analysis
Decision Making
Pareto Analysis
Paper illustration for Root Cause Tree Analysis
Operations
Root Cause Tree Analysis
Purposedifferent
For a single, hard-to-explain deviation, the method exposes the causal chain behind the visible symptom. It keeps the cause open until a controllable condition emerges instead of a mere description.For uncertain business assumptions, the method forces the idea into contact with real market reactions early. It separates wishful picture, assumption, and observable behavior, so that learning becomes faster than planning. This translates uncertainty into measurable insight.In many problem situations, effect is distributed unequally across many causes. A Pareto Analysis separates the few drivers with high leverage from the long remainder and focuses attention on what measurably moves the needle.For a problem with several suspected causes, the method builds a causal structure instead of a mere list. It makes visible how causes connect and where the strongest points of leverage lie.
Complexitydifferent
LowMediumLowMedium
Timedifferent
15-30 minWochen bis Monate je Lernzyklus30-60 min1-3 h
Participantsdifferent
2-62-81-62-8
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Root cause notes, CountermeasuresHypothesis list, MVPs, Learning reports, Pivot or persevere decisionPareto Chart, Top Causes, Focus ListCause Tree, Evidence Notes, Countermeasures
Tagsno overlap
Root causeIncidentLeanProblem solving
LeanStartupValidationMVP
PrioritizationQualityFocusRoot cause
Root causeTreeIncidentQuality
Add more methods