methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
A 5 Whys working surface connects an observable problem with evidenced causes, marked uncertainty and concrete countermeasures with ownership.
Operations
5 Whys
Paper illustration for Failure Mode and Effects Analysis
Operations
Failure Mode and Effects Analysis
Paper illustration for ALPEN Method
Operations
ALPEN Method
Paper fishbone diagram with a measurable effect at the head and six labeled cause branches.
Operations
Fishbone Diagram
Purposedifferent
For a single, hard-to-explain deviation, the method exposes the causal chain behind the visible symptom. It keeps the cause open until a controllable condition emerges instead of a mere description.For a process, product, or service with noticeable failure risks, the method assesses possible failure modes in advance. It directs attention to combinations of occurrence, effect, and detectability.With an overloaded day full of too many tasks, a realistic picture of the day emerges. The method connects estimating, deciding, and buffer thinking so planning fits available energy and time.When a problem has several possible contributing factors, the method sorts causes by cause areas. It prevents an initial hunch from blocking the view of other plausible drivers.
Complexitydifferent
LowHighLowLow
Timedifferent
15-30 min2-6 h10-20 min daily30-60 min
Participantsdifferent
2-63-1012-8
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshopAsyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Root cause notes, CountermeasuresFMEA Table, Risk Priority, Mitigation ActionsDaily Plan, Time Estimates, Review NotesFishbone Diagram, Cause Categories, Investigation Backlog
Tagsno overlap
Root causeIncidentLeanProblem solving
RiskQualityOperationsRoot cause
PlanningTime managementProductivityOperations
Root causeQualityOperations
Add more methods