View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Facilitation 1-2-4-All |  Facilitation Stakeholder Mapping |  Innovation SCAMPER |  Facilitation Alignment Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When many people in a group too rarely get to speak, 1-2-4-All distributes thinking time more fairly. The format builds participation step by step and makes quiet or still-unformed thoughts usable faster. | When an initiative depends on many people, interests, and power dynamics, Stakeholder Mapping systematically orders the environment. It shows who influences, who is affected, and where relationship management or safeguarding matters first. | For an existing solution under pressure to change, the method deliberately opens space for systematic variants. It directs attention to rebuilding, combining, and repurposing rather than only new basic ideas. This produces concrete evolution paths for products, offerings, or workflows. | When several people work toward one goal but hold different mental maps, Alignment Mapping makes the discrepancies visible. It arranges goals, assumptions, and priorities so shared direction becomes verifiable. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Low | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 10-20 min | 60–90 min | 30-60 min | 1-2 h |
Participantsdifferent | 4-100+ | 2-8 | 2-10 | 4-12 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Idea List, Shared Insights, Emergent Themes | Stakeholder Map, Engagement Plan, Risk Notes | SCAMPER Idea List, Concept Shortlist, Variation Notes | Alignment Map, Open Issues, Decision Questions |
Tagsno overlap | FacilitationInclusionIdeation | StakeholdersAlignmentFacilitationChange | BrainstormingIdeationCreativityReframingInnovation | AlignmentStakeholdersStrategyFacilitation |