View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Facilitation 1-2-4-All |  Facilitation Responsibility Poker |  Facilitation Dot Voting |  Innovation Round Robin Brainstorming |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When many people in a group too rarely get to speak, 1-2-4-All distributes thinking time more fairly. The format builds participation step by step and makes quiet or still-unformed thoughts usable faster. | When it stays unclear who carries responsibility and who only contributes, Responsibility Poker makes the distribution of responsibility explicit. It sharpens the boundaries between weighing in, deciding, and bearing consequences. | When a workshop has produced too many options and the group needs to condense quickly, dot voting makes preferences visible in a short time. It bundles individual votes into a solid signal for the next selection. | With unevenly distributed speaking time, the method brings every person into the contribution one after another. It prevents early voices from setting the direction while still producing a shared idea space. This makes participation plannable and the team's diversity visible. |
Complexitysame | Low | Low | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 10-20 min | 45-90 min | 5-15 min | 20-45 min |
Participantsdifferent | 4-100+ | 3-10 | 3-20 | 4-10 |
Formatsame | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Idea List, Shared Insights, Emergent Themes | Responsibility Map, Role Agreements, Open Questions | Ranked list, Consensus signal, Shortlist | Idea List, Cluster, Shortlist |
Tags1 shared | FacilitationInclusionIdeation | RolesResponsibilityTeamFacilitation | FacilitationVotingConsensusPrioritization | BrainstormingIdeationFacilitationInclusionCreativity |