View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Agile WSJF |  Facilitation Consensus Workshop |  Innovation Brainstorming |  Facilitation Dot Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When many tasks compete for the same capacity, it orders work by economic impact. It makes time lost, benefit, and effort comparable together. | When a group needs a solid decision without outvoting individual factions, a Consensus Workshop creates a negotiable common ground. It makes agreement, reservations, and open tensions discussable at the same time. | When a team faces an open question with many obvious directions, the method first creates breadth instead of premature commitment. It separates idea flow from evaluation and makes lines of thought visible, creating a pool for selection and further development. | When a workshop has produced too many options and the group needs to condense quickly, dot voting makes preferences visible in a short time. It bundles individual votes into a solid signal for the next selection. |
Complexitydifferent | High | Medium | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 45-90 min | 1-3 h | 30-60 min | 5-15 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-10 | 5-30 | 4-12 | 3-20 |
Formatsame | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Ranked Backlog, Cost-of-Delay Assumptions | Consensus Clusters, Theme Titles, Priority Areas | Idea pool, Theme clusters, Shortlist | Ranked list, Consensus signal, Shortlist |
Tagsno overlap | LeanEconomicsSequencePrioritization | FacilitationConsensusWorkshopAlignment | BrainstormingIdeationCreativityWorkshopDivergence | FacilitationVotingConsensusPrioritization |