methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
A paper-based illustration representing WSJF with its core stages and visible working result.
Agile
WSJF
Paper illustration of the Consensus Workshop working structure.
Facilitation
Consensus Workshop
Paper illustration for 8D Problem Solving.
Operations
8D Problem Solving
Paper illustration of the Lightning Decision Jam working structure.
Facilitation
Decision Jam
Purposedifferent
When many tasks compete for the same capacity, it orders work by economic impact. It makes time lost, benefit, and effort comparable together.When a group needs a solid decision without outvoting individual factions, a Consensus Workshop creates a negotiable common ground. It makes agreement, reservations, and open tensions discussable at the same time.For an acute quality or delivery problem, the method structures immediate protection and root cause work together. It keeps the situation stable while the actual cause is investigated cleanly.When a decision is stuck, Decision Jam loosens the knot through structured separation of problem, idea, and selection. The format creates movement without jumping prematurely at the first seemingly elegant answer.
Complexitydifferent
HighMediumHighLow
Timedifferent
45-90 min1-3 h1-6 Wochen60-90 min
Participantsdifferent
3-105-304-104-10
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Ranked Backlog, Cost-of-Delay AssumptionsConsensus Clusters, Theme Titles, Priority Areas8D Report, Containment Plan, Root Cause Evidence, Corrective Action PlanProblem Cluster, Prioritized Challenge, Experiment
Tagsno overlap
LeanEconomicsSequencePrioritization
FacilitationConsensusWorkshopAlignment
QualityProblem solvingRoot cause
FacilitationDecisionProblem solvingWorkshop
Add more methods