View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Agile WSJF |  Decision Making Assumption Surfacing |  Product Strategy RICE Scoring |  Decision Making Decision Matrix |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When many tasks compete for the same capacity, it orders work by economic impact. It makes time lost, benefit, and effort comparable together. | Plans often contain assumptions that were never openly stated and remain dangerous precisely because of that. Assumption Surfacing makes these silent premises visible and prioritizes which of them carry the initiative or could sink it. | When many initiatives compete for the same resources, it brings reach, impact, confidence, and effort into one shared ranking. It makes prioritization economically connectable. | When several options collide with several criteria, comparison quickly becomes subjective. A Decision Matrix makes the trade-off visible and brings weighting, criteria, and options into a shared logic. |
Complexitydifferent | High | Low | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 45-90 min | 45-90 min | 60-90 min | 45-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-10 | 2-8 | 2-10 | 2-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Ranked Backlog, Cost-of-Delay Assumptions | Assumption List, Critical Assumptions, Learning Plan | RICE Scores, Ranked List, Assumption Log | Decision Matrix, Scoring Rationale, Selected Option |
Tagsno overlap | LeanEconomicsSequencePrioritization | AssumptionsRiskDecisionDiscovery | PrioritizationScoringRoadmapTradeoffs | DecisionCriteriaScoringTradeoffs |