View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
Selected:Visual ManagementFailure Scenario AnalysisFailure Mode and Effects AnalysisFault Tree Analysis
| Criterion |  Operations Visual Management |  Engineering Failure Scenario Analysis |  Operations Failure Mode and Effects Analysis |  Operations Fault Tree Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | With high tempo and many parallel topics, the method makes status, deviations, and priorities visible at a glance. It reduces search effort and prevents what matters from getting lost in daily work. | In critical processes, it is not enough to plan only for the normal case. Failure Scenario Analysis looks at the path into failure and shows which failures, chains, and control gaps cause the most damage. | For a process, product, or service with noticeable failure risks, the method assesses possible failure modes in advance. It directs attention to combinations of occurrence, effect, and detectability. | For a critical top event with several possible triggers, the method logically models failure paths. It makes visible which combinations of conditions can lead to damage. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | High | High |
Timedifferent | Ongoing | 1-3 h | 2-6 h | 2-6 h |
Participantsdifferent | 1-20 | 3-8 | 3-10 | 3-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Visual Board, Status Indicators, Exception Cues | Failure Scenarios, Risk Notes, Control Gaps, Test and Response Actions | FMEA Table, Risk Priority, Mitigation Actions | Fault Tree, Critical Paths, Cause Hypotheses, Control Actions |
Tagsno overlap | SignalsOperationsVisual management | FailureResilienceRisk | RiskQualityOperationsRoot cause | RiskRoot causeSafety |