View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
Selected:Visual ManagementDot EstimationArchitecture Decision RecordFailure Mode and Effects Analysis
| Criterion |  Operations Visual Management |  Facilitation Dot Estimation |  Architecture Architecture Decision Record |  Operations Failure Mode and Effects Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | With high tempo and many parallel topics, the method makes status, deviations, and priorities visible at a glance. It reduces search effort and prevents what matters from getting lost in daily work. | When size or effort can only be estimated roughly, Dot Estimation condenses the group's experience into a quick range. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as an Effort Heatmap, Risk Signals, and Discussion Targets. | An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable. | For a process, product, or service with noticeable failure risks, the method assesses possible failure modes in advance. It directs attention to combinations of occurrence, effect, and detectability. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Low | Low | High |
Timedifferent | Ongoing | 5-20 min | 15-45 min | 2-6 h |
Participantsdifferent | 1-20 | 3-20 | 1-3 | 3-10 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Visual Board, Status Indicators, Exception Cues | Effort Heatmap, Risk Signals, Discussion Targets | ADR File, Decision Log, Rationale | FMEA Table, Risk Priority, Mitigation Actions |
Tagsno overlap | SignalsOperationsVisual management | EstimationEffortRisk | ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance | RiskQualityOperationsRoot cause |