View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  UX Research User Interviews |  Product Strategy KPI Tree |  Facilitation Problem Framing Workshop |  Product Strategy Counter Metrics |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When teams derive needs only from assumptions and real motives are missing, user interviews give direct access to behavior and meaning. Conversations from the target group's everyday life make patterns, tensions, and open questions solidly visible. | When metrics across the organization drift apart, it arranges drivers and effects under one shared logic. It connects customer value, product logic, and decision priorities. The result is captured as a KPI tree and owner list. | When a team works on symptoms but the real question stays fuzzy, a Problem Framing Workshop sharpens the view of the right problem. It separates observation, interpretation, and target picture from each other. | When a headline metric could mask side effects, it adds guardrail signals against unwanted outcomes. It connects customer value, product logic, and decision priorities. The result is captured as a counter-metric list and guardrail definitions. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 30–60 min per interview | 90-180 min initial, dann laufend | 60-120 min | 30-60 min |
Participantsdifferent | 1 participant per interview | 3-8 | 4-10 | 2-6 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Interview Notes, Themes, Insight Summary | KPI Tree, Owner List | Problem Statement, Scope Boundaries, Assumption List, Next Analysis Questions | Counter Metric List, Guardrail Definitions |
Tagsno overlap | QualitativeResearchCustomerDiscovery | MetricsStrategyAlignmentMeasurement | FacilitationAlignmentDiscovery | MetricsMeasurementStrategyExperiments |