View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Facilitation Troika Consulting | ![]() Facilitation Fishbowl Discussion | ![]() Innovation Round Robin Brainstorming | ![]() Facilitation Barcamp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When someone needs to sort out a concrete work problem, Troika Consulting offers fast peer consulting with a tight focus. The method brings perspectives together without taking responsibility out of the person's hands. | When a controversial topic needs depth and discipline at the same time, Fishbowl Discussion makes the structure of the conversation transparent. The format keeps the core small enough for real dialogue and open enough for controlled turnover. | With unevenly distributed speaking time, the method brings every person into the contribution one after another. It prevents early voices from setting the direction while still producing a shared idea space. This makes participation plannable and the team's diversity visible. | When many people can contribute knowledge and the flow should stay open, Barcamp provides a framework for self-organized sessions. The format channels energy without defining the content too narrowly in advance. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 30-45 min | 45-90 min | 20-45 min | Halber Tag bis 2 Tage |
Participantsdifferent | 3-30 | 8-80 | 4-10 | 15-200 |
Formatsame | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Advice Notes, Next Actions, Peer Insights | Discussion Insights, Observed Tensions, Follow-up Questions | Idea List, Cluster, Shortlist | Session Board, Session Notes, Community Learnings |
Tags1 shared | FacilitationCoachingLearning | FacilitationDialogueLarge group | BrainstormingIdeationFacilitationInclusionCreativity | FacilitationLarge groupLearning |



