View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Innovation TRIZ |  Architecture Request for Comments |  Facilitation Decision Jam |  Architecture Architecture Decision Record |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | For technical contradictions or trade-offs, the method looks for solutions that resolve opposing requirements at the same time. It translates limits into an explicit picture of conflict that becomes workable. This produces not just compromises but more elegant principles. | An RFC clarifies architecture context, options, and consequences. It structures technical context, alternatives, tradeoffs, open questions, and review feedback, and captures the result as an RFC document, reviewer comments, and a decision rationale. | When a decision is stuck, Decision Jam loosens the knot through structured separation of problem, idea, and selection. The format creates movement without jumping prematurely at the first seemingly elegant answer. | An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable. |
Complexitydifferent | High | Medium | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 1-4 h | 1-3 Wochen vom Draft bis zur Entscheidung | 60-90 min | 15-45 min |
Participantsdifferent | 2-8 | 3-20 Reviewer | 4-10 | 1-3 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Async | Workshop | Async |
Outputdifferent | Contradiction Statement, Inventive Principles, Solution Concepts | RFC document, Reviewer comments, Decision rationale, Follow-up ADR or tickets | Problem Cluster, Prioritized Challenge, Experiment | ADR File, Decision Log, Rationale |
Tagsno overlap | InnovationProblem solvingContradictionsCreativity | ArchitectureDecisionAsyncGovernance | FacilitationDecisionProblem solvingWorkshop | ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance |