View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Decision Making Radar |  Business Strategy Ansoff Matrix |  Architecture Architecture Decision Record |  Business Strategy Porter Five Forces |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When capabilities, maturity levels, or market positions need to be compared across several dimensions, overview is easily lost. Radar brings different characteristics into a shared picture and shows patterns faster than tables do. | The Ansoff Matrix organizes growth options by market and product relation. It helps weigh expansion, diversification, and adaptation cleanly against each other. | An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable. | Porter Five Forces analyzes the forces that shape competitive pressure and profitability in a market. The view of market structure goes beyond individual competitors and reveals systemic pressure points. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 1-2 h | 45-90 min | 15-45 min | 1-3 h |
Participantsdifferent | 2-10 | 2-8 | 1-3 | 2-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Radar Map, Capability Scores, Action Areas | Ansoff Matrix, Growth Options, Risk Notes | ADR File, Decision Log, Rationale | Five Forces Analysis, Competitive Risks, Strategic Options |
Tagsno overlap | AssessmentPortfolioCapability | GrowthStrategyMarketPortfolio | ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance | StrategyCompetitionMarket |