methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of an activity-role table with clear RACI assignments and one highlighted accountable role per activity.
Operations
RACI Matrix
Paper notes move from an inbox to action, project and calendar collections.
Operations
Getting Things Done
Affinity Diagramming
UX Research
Affinity Diagramming
Paper illustration of Decision Rights Mapping with its method-specific working model.
Decision Making
Decision Rights Mapping
Purposedifferent
With unclear responsibilities across several roles or areas, the method creates unambiguous accountability logic. It reduces friction because decision, execution, contribution, and information become separately visible.With many open commitments and ideas in daily life, a reliable external storage system emerges. The method relieves the mind so priority and context don't have to compete in memory.When research notes, feedback, or observations sit unconnected side by side, affinity diagramming sorts the raw material into solid themes. Many individual points turn into patterns that make decisions and opportunities clearer.In organizations with many stakeholders, it often blurs who actually decides and who is merely consulted. It separates options, evaluation criteria, and open risks. The result is captured as a Decision Rights matrix and an agreement.
Complexitydifferent
LowMediumLowMedium
Timedifferent
45-90 min1-2 h Setup, laufend45–90 min90-180 min
Participantsdifferent
2-813-104-12
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncAsyncWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
RACI Matrix, Responsibility Map, Decision NotesAction Lists, Project List, Review RoutineTheme clusters, Insight statements, Opportunity areasDecision Rights Matrix, Agreement
Tagsno overlap
RolesResponsibilityGovernanceOperations
ProductivityPlanningTasksExecution
SynthesisQualitativeRoot cause
DecisionGovernanceAlignmentResponsibility
Add more methods