methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of Porter’s five competitive forces
Business Strategy
Porter Five Forces
Paper illustration of HEART Framework with its method-specific working model.
UX Research
HEART Framework
Paper illustration of a two-by-two Ansoff Matrix with four growth directions
Business Strategy
Ansoff Matrix
Paper scorecard with four perspectives, connected objective cards and columns for measures, targets and initiatives.
Business Strategy
Balanced Scorecard
Purposedifferent
Porter Five Forces analyzes the forces that shape competitive pressure and profitability in a market. The view of market structure goes beyond individual competitors and reveals systemic pressure points.Helps clarify observations, needs, and patterns in concrete terms. It groups observations into patterns, questions, and decisions. The result is captured as a HEART-GSM table and dashboard.The Ansoff Matrix organizes growth options by market and product relation. It helps weigh expansion, diversification, and adaptation cleanly against each other.Balanced Scorecard translates strategy into a few interconnected perspectives and metrics. It holds impact, steering, and learning together in daily work instead of narrowing strategy down to financial figures.
Complexitydifferent
MediumMediumLowHigh
Timedifferent
1-3 h120 min initial, dann laufend45-90 minHalber Tag bis mehrere Wochen
Participantsdifferent
2-83-62-84-12
Formatsame
Workshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Five Forces Analysis, Competitive Risks, Strategic OptionsHEART-GSM Table, DashboardAnsoff Matrix, Growth Options, Risk NotesBalanced Scorecard, Strategic Measures, Initiative Map
Tagsno overlap
StrategyCompetitionMarket
MetricsUX researchMeasurementSatisfaction
GrowthStrategyMarketPortfolio
StrategyMetricsExecution
Add more methods