methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for PERT Estimation.
Decision Making
PERT Estimation
Paper fishbone diagram with a measurable effect at the head and six labeled cause branches.
Operations
Fishbone Diagram
Paper illustration for Dot Estimation.
Facilitation
Dot Estimation
Paper illustration for Failure Mode and Effects Analysis
Operations
Failure Mode and Effects Analysis
Purposedifferent
On complex initiatives, a plain average tends to understate just how uncertain the outcome really is. It separates options, evaluation criteria, and open risks. The result is captured as a PERT Estimate, Expected Value, and Risk Notes.When a problem has several possible contributing factors, the method sorts causes by cause areas. It prevents an initial hunch from blocking the view of other plausible drivers.When size or effort can only be estimated roughly, Dot Estimation condenses the group's experience into a quick range. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as an Effort Heatmap, Risk Signals, and Discussion Targets.For a process, product, or service with noticeable failure risks, the method assesses possible failure modes in advance. It directs attention to combinations of occurrence, effect, and detectability.
Complexitydifferent
MediumLowLowHigh
Timedifferent
15-45 min30-60 min5-20 min2-6 h
Participantsdifferent
1-82-83-203-10
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
PERT Estimate, Expected Value, Risk NotesFishbone Diagram, Cause Categories, Investigation BacklogEffort Heatmap, Risk Signals, Discussion TargetsFMEA Table, Risk Priority, Mitigation Actions
Tagsno overlap
EstimationUncertaintyRisk
Root causeQualityOperations
EstimationEffortRisk
RiskQualityOperationsRoot cause
Add more methods