View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Knowledge Modeling Peer Instruction | ![]() Delivery Shape Up | ![]() Facilitation Stakeholder Mapping | ![]() Facilitation Lean Coffee |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | Peer Instruction uses group thinking to clarify difficult terms or concepts faster. The method combines individual reflection with social correction and shared precision. | Shape Up helps clarify scope, sequence, and delivery flow. It makes work boundaries and decisions explicit and captures results as pitches, bet-table decisions, and hill charts. | When an initiative depends on many people, interests, and power dynamics, Stakeholder Mapping systematically orders the environment. It shows who influences, who is affected, and where relationship management or safeguarding matters first. | When a group without a fixed agenda needs to get into useful conversations quickly, Lean Coffee structures the start around interests rather than a presentation. The group itself negotiates which topics get time first and which wait. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 10-20 min je Frage | 6 Wochen Cycle + 2 Wochen Cool-Down | 60–90 min | 30-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 6-50 | 2-4 pro Pitch | 2-8 | 3-20 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Concept Questions, Vote Results, Learning Notes | Pitches, Bet-table decisions, Hill charts, Cooldown outcomes | Stakeholder Map, Engagement Plan, Risk Notes | Prioritized Topics, Discussion Notes, Action Items |
Tagsno overlap | LearningDialogueFacilitation | PlanningDeliveryAutonomy | StakeholdersAlignmentFacilitationChange | FacilitationAutonomyDialogue |



