View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Product Discovery Outcome-Driven Innovation | ![]() Agile WSJF | ![]() Product Discovery Opportunity Scoring | ![]() Delivery Cost of Delay |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | Outcome-Driven Innovation clarifies customer problems, solution opportunities, and evidence. It separates jobs, desired outcomes, importance, satisfaction, and opportunity, and captures results as desired outcome statements, an opportunity landscape, and segments by underserved needs. | When many tasks compete for the same capacity, it orders work by economic impact. It makes time lost, benefit, and effort comparable together. | When opportunities need ranking by their effect, it makes importance and satisfaction directly comparable. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence. The result is captured as an opportunity-score table and top outcomes. | Helps clarify scope, order, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, constraints, and sequence manageable. The result is captured as a Cost of Delay table and prioritization sequence. |
Complexitydifferent | High | High | Medium | High |
Timedifferent | Mehrere Wochen | 45-90 min | 60-120 min | 90-180 min |
Participantsdifferent | 2-6 researchers plus sample | 3-10 | 3-6 | 3-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Desired outcome statements, Opportunity landscape, Segmentation by underserved needs, Innovation hypotheses | Ranked Backlog, Cost-of-Delay Assumptions | Opportunity Score Table, Top Outcomes | CoD Table, Prioritization Sequence |
Tagsno overlap | OutcomesInnovationResearchQuantitative | LeanEconomicsSequencePrioritization | PrioritizationDiscoveryOutcomesNeeds | PrioritizationDeliveryEconomicsDecision |



