View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Product Discovery Outcome-Driven Innovation |  Business Strategy Three Horizons |  Innovation Design Thinking |  Business Strategy Ansoff Matrix |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | Outcome-Driven Innovation clarifies customer problems, solution opportunities, and evidence. It separates jobs, desired outcomes, importance, satisfaction, and opportunity, and captures results as desired outcome statements, an opportunity landscape, and segments by underserved needs. | Three Horizons helps clarify strategic options across different timeframes. It compares strengths, risks, market logic, and investment choices, and captures the result as a horizon map, portfolio view, and initiatives per horizon. | For complex user problems with an uncertain cause, the method connects observation, interpretation, and experiment into a learning cycle. It keeps the focus on real needs and avoids premature solution language. This produces robust decisions for product and service. | The Ansoff Matrix organizes growth options by market and product relation. It helps weigh expansion, diversification, and adaptation cleanly against each other. |
Complexitydifferent | High | Medium | High | Low |
Timedifferent | Mehrere Wochen | Halbtags-Workshop, dann iterativ | 1 Tag bis mehrere Wochen | 45-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 2-6 researchers plus sample | 3-12 | 4-10 | 2-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Desired outcome statements, Opportunity landscape, Segmentation by underserved needs, Innovation hypotheses | Horizon map, Portfolio view, Initiatives per horizon, Resource plan | Problem Statement, Prototype, Test Learnings | Ansoff Matrix, Growth Options, Risk Notes |
Tagsno overlap | OutcomesInnovationResearchQuantitative | StrategyInnovationPortfolioForesight | InnovationPrototypeResearch | GrowthStrategyMarketPortfolio |