Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Selected:Outcome-Driven Innovation Decision Rights Mapping Architecture Inception Canvas Software Architecture Canvas

Criterion	Product Discovery Outcome-Driven Innovation	Decision Making Decision Rights Mapping	Architecture Architecture Inception Canvas	Architecture Software Architecture Canvas
Purposedifferent	Outcome-Driven Innovation clarifies customer problems, solution opportunities, and evidence. It separates jobs, desired outcomes, importance, satisfaction, and opportunity, and captures results as desired outcome statements, an opportunity landscape, and segments by underserved needs.	In organizations with many stakeholders, it often blurs who actually decides and who is merely consulted. It separates options, evaluation criteria, and open risks. The result is captured as a Decision Rights matrix and an agreement.	The Architecture Inception Canvas bundles the first architecture questions into a compact decision picture. It fits when an initiative is still in motion but still needs clear guardrails.	The Software Architecture Canvas reduces a system to the most important architecture decisions, constraints, and interfaces. It is useful when teams need a resilient overall picture quickly.
Complexitydifferent	High	Medium	Low	Low
Timedifferent	Mehrere Wochen	90-180 min	1-2 h	1-2 h
Participantsdifferent	2-6 researchers plus sample	4-12	3-8	3-10
Formatdifferent	Workshop + async	Workshop	Workshop	Workshop
Outputdifferent	Desired outcome statements, Opportunity landscape, Segmentation by underserved needs, Innovation hypotheses	Decision Rights Matrix, Agreement	Inception Canvas, Risks, Goal List, Open Questions	Architecture Canvas, Goals, Constraints, Quality Attributes
Tagsno overlap	OutcomesInnovationResearchQuantitative	DecisionGovernanceAlignmentResponsibility	AlignmentArchitectureCanvas	CanvasArchitectureAlignmentWorkshop

Add more methods