methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Four paper stations connect system purpose, quality goals, risk cards and focused investigation with a target and gap profile.
Architecture
LASR (Lightweight Approach for Software Reviews)
Paper illustration for Behavior Over Time Graph.
Systems Thinking
Behavior Over Time Graph
Design sheets and interface cards connect to jointly written pseudocode with highlighted unresolved questions.
Architecture
ARID (Active Reviews for Intermediate Designs)
Stock and Flow Diagram method illustration showing its working structure
Systems Thinking
Stock and Flow Diagram
Purposedifferent
LASR helps development teams identify where their software falls short of important quality goals and which improvements to consider. A small group with existing system knowledge can make an initial assessment and investigate open questions in more detail.A Behavior Over Time Graph shows how a metric or observation develops over time. The method makes trends, breaks, and recurring patterns visible that get lost in snapshots.ARID examines how well developers can work with a technical design. It focuses on a part of the system that can still be revised, between the architecture overview and the detailed specification.A Stock and Flow Diagram shows how stocks, inflows, and outflows shape a system over time. It is especially suited when growth, delays, or capacity limits determine the dynamics.
Complexitydifferent
MediumLowMediumHigh
Timedifferent
3–4 h for initial assessment; preparation and deeper analysis additional20-45 min2–4 h review as a planning range; preparation and evaluation additional2-6 h
Participantsdifferent
1 or a small team; particularly suitable for 3–4 people1-10Designers, developers as users, and facilitation1-6
Formatsame
Workshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Lean Mission Statement describing the software’s purpose, Prioritized quality goals and evaluation criteria, Risks and estimated gaps against quality goals, More closely examined findings and open checksBehavior Over Time Graph, Trend Hypotheses, Key EventsPrioritized development tasks, Jointly produced code or pseudocode, Observed difficulties and open design questions, Proposed design revisionsStock and Flow Model, Dynamics Notes, Simulation Hypotheses
Tagsno overlap
ArchitectureQualityRiskAssessmentLean
Systems thinkingPatternsDynamics
ArchitectureEngineeringFeedbackValidationTasks
DynamicsSimulationFeedbackSystems thinking
Add more methods