View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Product Discovery Kano Model |  Facilitation 1-2-4-All |  Agile WSJF |  Innovation Round Robin Brainstorming |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When features need to be distinguished by their effect on satisfaction, it makes expectations and surprises comparable. It separates basic needs, performance contribution, and delight. | When many people in a group too rarely get to speak, 1-2-4-All distributes thinking time more fairly. The format builds participation step by step and makes quiet or still-unformed thoughts usable faster. | When many tasks compete for the same capacity, it orders work by economic impact. It makes time lost, benefit, and effort comparable together. | With unevenly distributed speaking time, the method brings every person into the contribution one after another. It prevents early voices from setting the direction while still producing a shared idea space. This makes participation plannable and the team's diversity visible. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | High | Low |
Timedifferent | 1-2 Tage | 10-20 min | 45-90 min | 20-45 min |
Participantsdifferent | 10-50 | 4-100+ | 3-10 | 4-10 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Kano Matrix, Feature Classes, Priority Themes | Idea List, Shared Insights, Emergent Themes | Ranked Backlog, Cost-of-Delay Assumptions | Idea List, Cluster, Shortlist |
Tagsno overlap | SatisfactionPrioritizationCustomer | FacilitationInclusionIdeation | LeanEconomicsSequencePrioritization | BrainstormingIdeationFacilitationInclusionCreativity |