View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Growth Golden Circle |  Architecture Software Architecture Canvas |  Team Design Team API |  Architecture C4 Model |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | In positioning and communication, what an offering actually stands for often becomes blurred. The Golden Circle sharpens a product's inner rationale and connects purpose, approach, and offering into a clear statement. | The Software Architecture Canvas reduces a system to the most important architecture decisions, constraints, and interfaces. It is useful when teams need a resilient overall picture quickly. | When expectations between teams stay fuzzy, it describes how a team can be reached, used, and held accountable. It clarifies responsibility, interaction, and load between teams. The result is captured as a Team API document. | The C4 Model makes a system legible across several resolution levels, from context down to code. It suits situations where different audiences need to understand the same architecture from different altitudes. |
Complexitysame | Low | Low | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 30-60 min | 1-2 h | Half day initial, dann laufend | 1-4 h |
Participantsdifferent | 1-8 | 3-10 | Ein Team plus Stakeholder | 1-5 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Why Statement, Messaging Notes, Positioning Draft | Architecture Canvas, Goals, Constraints, Quality Attributes | Team API Document | Context Diagram, Container Diagram, Component Diagram |
Tagsno overlap | MarketingPositioningCommunication | CanvasArchitectureAlignmentWorkshop | TeamAlignmentCommunicationService | ArchitectureCommunicationVisualization |