View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Growth Golden Circle |  Decision Making PERT Estimation |  Architecture C4 Model |  Facilitation Dot Estimation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | In positioning and communication, what an offering actually stands for often becomes blurred. The Golden Circle sharpens a product's inner rationale and connects purpose, approach, and offering into a clear statement. | On complex initiatives, a plain average tends to understate just how uncertain the outcome really is. It separates options, evaluation criteria, and open risks. The result is captured as a PERT Estimate, Expected Value, and Risk Notes. | The C4 Model makes a system legible across several resolution levels, from context down to code. It suits situations where different audiences need to understand the same architecture from different altitudes. | When size or effort can only be estimated roughly, Dot Estimation condenses the group's experience into a quick range. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as an Effort Heatmap, Risk Signals, and Discussion Targets. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 30-60 min | 15-45 min | 1-4 h | 5-20 min |
Participantsdifferent | 1-8 | 1-8 | 1-5 | 3-20 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Why Statement, Messaging Notes, Positioning Draft | PERT Estimate, Expected Value, Risk Notes | Context Diagram, Container Diagram, Component Diagram | Effort Heatmap, Risk Signals, Discussion Targets |
Tagsno overlap | MarketingPositioningCommunication | EstimationUncertaintyRisk | ArchitectureCommunicationVisualization | EstimationEffortRisk |