View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Growth Golden Circle | ![]() Facilitation Dot Estimation | ![]() Facilitation Stakeholder Salience Model | ![]() Delivery RAID Log |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | In positioning and communication, what an offering actually stands for often becomes blurred. The Golden Circle sharpens a product's inner rationale and connects purpose, approach, and offering into a clear statement. | When size or effort can only be estimated roughly, Dot Estimation condenses the group's experience into a quick range. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as an Effort Heatmap, Risk Signals, and Discussion Targets. | When stakeholders appear to matter very differently, the Stakeholder Salience Model rates their actual priority through power, legitimacy, and urgency. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as a Salience diagram and a class-based strategy. | Helps clarify scope, sequence, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, boundaries, and order steerable. The result is captured as a RAID Log and a source for status reporting. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Low | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 30-60 min | 5-20 min | 60-90 min | 30 min Setup, dann laufend |
Participantsdifferent | 1-8 | 3-20 | 3-6 | 1-3 maintaining, briefing for everyone |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop | Async |
Outputdifferent | Why Statement, Messaging Notes, Positioning Draft | Effort Heatmap, Risk Signals, Discussion Targets | Salience Diagram, Strategy per Class | RAID Log, Status Report Source |
Tagsno overlap | MarketingPositioningCommunication | EstimationEffortRisk | StakeholdersFacilitationAlignmentGovernance | RiskTrackingStakeholdersGovernance |



