View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Growth Golden Circle | ![]() Facilitation Dot Estimation | ![]() Delivery RAID Log | ![]() Agile Ideal Days |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | In positioning and communication, what an offering actually stands for often becomes blurred. The Golden Circle sharpens a product's inner rationale and connects purpose, approach, and offering into a clear statement. | When size or effort can only be estimated roughly, Dot Estimation condenses the group's experience into a quick range. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as an Effort Heatmap, Risk Signals, and Discussion Targets. | Helps clarify scope, sequence, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, boundaries, and order steerable. The result is captured as a RAID Log and a source for status reporting. | When effort needs to be thought of as real working time, it offers a simple common denominator for comparison. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as Ideal Day Estimates, Assumption Notes, and Capacity Caveats. |
Complexitysame | Low | Low | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 30-60 min | 5-20 min | 30 min Setup, dann laufend | 15-60 min |
Participantsdifferent | 1-8 | 3-20 | 1-3 maintaining, briefing for everyone | 2-9 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Why Statement, Messaging Notes, Positioning Draft | Effort Heatmap, Risk Signals, Discussion Targets | RAID Log, Status Report Source | Ideal Day Estimates, Assumption Notes, Capacity Caveats |
Tagsno overlap | MarketingPositioningCommunication | EstimationEffortRisk | RiskTrackingStakeholdersGovernance | EstimationEffortAgile |



