View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
Selected:Goal Question MetricSoftware Architecture CanvasDecision Rights MappingRequest for Comments
| Criterion |  Engineering Goal Question Metric |  Architecture Software Architecture Canvas |  Decision Making Decision Rights Mapping |  Architecture Request for Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | Helps clarify technical problems, hypotheses, and next steps in concrete terms. It breaks a technical problem into testable parts. The result is captured as a GQM table and metric briefs. | The Software Architecture Canvas reduces a system to the most important architecture decisions, constraints, and interfaces. It is useful when teams need a resilient overall picture quickly. | In organizations with many stakeholders, it often blurs who actually decides and who is merely consulted. It separates options, evaluation criteria, and open risks. The result is captured as a Decision Rights matrix and an agreement. | An RFC clarifies architecture context, options, and consequences. It structures technical context, alternatives, tradeoffs, open questions, and review feedback, and captures the result as an RFC document, reviewer comments, and a decision rationale. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 90-180 min | 1-2 h | 90-180 min | 1-3 Wochen vom Draft bis zur Entscheidung |
Participantsdifferent | 3-6 | 3-10 | 4-12 | 3-20 Reviewer |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop | Async |
Outputdifferent | GQM Table, Metric Profiles | Architecture Canvas, Goals, Constraints, Quality Attributes | Decision Rights Matrix, Agreement | RFC document, Reviewer comments, Decision rationale, Follow-up ADR or tickets |
Tagsno overlap | MetricsMeasurementEngineeringAlignment | CanvasArchitectureAlignmentWorkshop | DecisionGovernanceAlignmentResponsibility | ArchitectureDecisionAsyncGovernance |