methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of Goal Question Metric with its method-specific working model.
Engineering
Goal Question Metric
Paper illustration of HEART Framework with its method-specific working model.
UX Research
HEART Framework
Paper illustration for Dot Estimation.
Facilitation
Dot Estimation
Paper illustration of Counter Metrics with its method-specific working model.
Product Strategy
Counter Metrics
Purposedifferent
Helps clarify technical problems, hypotheses, and next steps in concrete terms. It breaks a technical problem into testable parts. The result is captured as a GQM table and metric briefs.Helps clarify observations, needs, and patterns in concrete terms. It groups observations into patterns, questions, and decisions. The result is captured as a HEART-GSM table and dashboard.When size or effort can only be estimated roughly, Dot Estimation condenses the group's experience into a quick range. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as an Effort Heatmap, Risk Signals, and Discussion Targets.When a headline metric could mask side effects, it adds guardrail signals against unwanted outcomes. It connects customer value, product logic, and decision priorities. The result is captured as a counter-metric list and guardrail definitions.
Complexitydifferent
MediumMediumLowLow
Timedifferent
90-180 min120 min initial, dann laufend5-20 min30-60 min
Participantsdifferent
3-63-63-202-6
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
GQM Table, Metric ProfilesHEART-GSM Table, DashboardEffort Heatmap, Risk Signals, Discussion TargetsCounter Metric List, Guardrail Definitions
Tagsno overlap
MetricsMeasurementEngineeringAlignment
MetricsUX researchMeasurementSatisfaction
EstimationEffortRisk
MetricsMeasurementStrategyExperiments
Add more methods