methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of GIST Planning with its method-specific working model.
Product Strategy
GIST Planning
A hypothetical failure makes concrete risks, signals, and fitting mitigations visible.
Decision Making
Pre-Mortem
Paper illustration for Dot Estimation.
Facilitation
Dot Estimation
Paper illustration for Failure Scenario Analysis.
Engineering
Failure Scenario Analysis
Purposedifferent
GIST Planning helps clarify target groups, value, goals, and priorities. It links customer value, product logic, and decision priorities, and captures the result as goals, an idea bank, and a step-project list.In early initiatives with many uncertainties, planning quickly turns too optimistic. A pre-mortem makes the expected failure visible in advance and sharpens the view of causes, gaps, and countermeasures.When size or effort can only be estimated roughly, Dot Estimation condenses the group's experience into a quick range. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as an Effort Heatmap, Risk Signals, and Discussion Targets.In critical processes, it is not enough to plan only for the normal case. Failure Scenario Analysis looks at the path into failure and shows which failures, chains, and control gaps cause the most damage.
Complexitydifferent
MediumLowLowMedium
Timedifferent
Wochen bis Monate je Goal20–45 min5-20 min1-3 h
Participantsdifferent
3-10Small cross-functional group3-203-8
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Goals, Idea bank, Step-project list, Tasks, Learning reportsRisk list, Mitigation plan, Assumption logEffort Heatmap, Risk Signals, Discussion TargetsFailure Scenarios, Risk Notes, Control Gaps, Test and Response Actions
Tagsno overlap
RoadmapOutcomesPlanningExperiments
RiskDecisionFailurePlanning
EstimationEffortRisk
FailureResilienceRisk
Add more methods