View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
Selected:Gemba WalkFailure Mode and Effects AnalysisSCAMPERLASR (Lightweight Approach for Software Reviews)
| Criterion |  Operations Gemba Walk |  Operations Failure Mode and Effects Analysis |  Innovation SCAMPER |  Architecture LASR (Lightweight Approach for Software Reviews) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When there is uncertainty about the real course of a process, the method brings observation to the place where work happens. It combines perception, follow-up questions, and process knowledge so decisions rest on actual workflows instead of assumptions. | For a process, product, or service with noticeable failure risks, the method assesses possible failure modes in advance. It directs attention to combinations of occurrence, effect, and detectability. | For an existing solution under pressure to change, the method deliberately opens space for systematic variants. It directs attention to rebuilding, combining, and repurposing rather than only new basic ideas. This produces concrete evolution paths for products, offerings, or workflows. | LASR helps development teams identify where their software falls short of important quality goals and which improvements to consider. A small group with existing system knowledge can make an initial assessment and investigate open questions in more detail. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | High | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 30-120 min | 2-6 h | 30-60 min | 3–4 h for initial assessment; preparation and deeper analysis additional |
Participantsdifferent | 2-6 | 3-10 | 2-10 | 1 or a small team; particularly suitable for 3–4 people |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Observation Notes, Improvement Ideas | FMEA Table, Risk Priority, Mitigation Actions | SCAMPER Idea List, Concept Shortlist, Variation Notes | Lean Mission Statement describing the software’s purpose, Prioritized quality goals and evaluation criteria, Risks and estimated gaps against quality goals, More closely examined findings and open checks |
Tagsno overlap | LeanObservationProcessOperations | RiskQualityOperationsRoot cause | BrainstormingIdeationCreativityReframingInnovation | ArchitectureQualityRiskAssessmentLean |