methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Failure Mode and Effects Analysis
Operations
Failure Mode and Effects Analysis
Paper illustration for Pareto Analysis
Decision Making
Pareto Analysis
A 5 Whys working surface connects an observable problem with evidenced causes, marked uncertainty and concrete countermeasures with ownership.
Operations
5 Whys
Paper fishbone diagram with a measurable effect at the head and six labeled cause branches.
Operations
Fishbone Diagram
Purposedifferent
For a process, product, or service with noticeable failure risks, the method assesses possible failure modes in advance. It directs attention to combinations of occurrence, effect, and detectability.In many problem situations, effect is distributed unequally across many causes. A Pareto Analysis separates the few drivers with high leverage from the long remainder and focuses attention on what measurably moves the needle.For a single, hard-to-explain deviation, the method exposes the causal chain behind the visible symptom. It keeps the cause open until a controllable condition emerges instead of a mere description.When a problem has several possible contributing factors, the method sorts causes by cause areas. It prevents an initial hunch from blocking the view of other plausible drivers.
Complexitydifferent
HighLowLowLow
Timedifferent
2-6 h30-60 min15-30 min30-60 min
Participantsdifferent
3-101-62-62-8
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
FMEA Table, Risk Priority, Mitigation ActionsPareto Chart, Top Causes, Focus ListRoot cause notes, CountermeasuresFishbone Diagram, Cause Categories, Investigation Backlog
Tags1 shared
RiskQualityOperationsRoot cause
PrioritizationQualityFocusRoot cause
Root causeIncidentLeanProblem solving
Root causeQualityOperations
Add more methods