methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper fishbone diagram with a measurable effect at the head and six labeled cause branches.
Operations
Fishbone Diagram
Paper illustration for Three-Point Estimation.
Decision Making
Three-Point Estimation
Paper illustration for Failure Mode and Effects Analysis
Operations
Failure Mode and Effects Analysis
Paper illustration for Dot Estimation.
Facilitation
Dot Estimation
Purposedifferent
When a problem has several possible contributing factors, the method sorts causes by cause areas. It prevents an initial hunch from blocking the view of other plausible drivers.A single estimate for effort, time, or risk often looks too smooth for the real uncertainty behind it. It separates options, evaluation criteria, and open risks. The result is captured as a Three-Point Estimate, Risk Range, and Assumption Notes.For a process, product, or service with noticeable failure risks, the method assesses possible failure modes in advance. It directs attention to combinations of occurrence, effect, and detectability.When size or effort can only be estimated roughly, Dot Estimation condenses the group's experience into a quick range. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as an Effort Heatmap, Risk Signals, and Discussion Targets.
Complexitydifferent
LowMediumHighLow
Timedifferent
30-60 min10-30 min je Item2-6 h5-20 min
Participantsdifferent
2-81-83-103-20
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Fishbone Diagram, Cause Categories, Investigation BacklogThree-Point Estimate, Risk Range, Assumption NotesFMEA Table, Risk Priority, Mitigation ActionsEffort Heatmap, Risk Signals, Discussion Targets
Tagsno overlap
Root causeQualityOperations
EstimationUncertaintyForecasting
RiskQualityOperationsRoot cause
EstimationEffortRisk
Add more methods