View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
Selected:Fishbone DiagramOutcome-Driven InnovationFault Tree AnalysisFailure Mode and Effects Analysis
| Criterion |  Operations Fishbone Diagram |  Product Discovery Outcome-Driven Innovation |  Operations Fault Tree Analysis |  Operations Failure Mode and Effects Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a problem has several possible contributing factors, the method sorts causes by cause areas. It prevents an initial hunch from blocking the view of other plausible drivers. | Outcome-Driven Innovation clarifies customer problems, solution opportunities, and evidence. It separates jobs, desired outcomes, importance, satisfaction, and opportunity, and captures results as desired outcome statements, an opportunity landscape, and segments by underserved needs. | For a critical top event with several possible triggers, the method logically models failure paths. It makes visible which combinations of conditions can lead to damage. | For a process, product, or service with noticeable failure risks, the method assesses possible failure modes in advance. It directs attention to combinations of occurrence, effect, and detectability. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | High | High | High |
Timedifferent | 30-60 min | Mehrere Wochen | 2-6 h | 2-6 h |
Participantsdifferent | 2-8 | 2-6 researchers plus sample | 3-8 | 3-10 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Fishbone Diagram, Cause Categories, Investigation Backlog | Desired outcome statements, Opportunity landscape, Segmentation by underserved needs, Innovation hypotheses | Fault Tree, Critical Paths, Cause Hypotheses, Control Actions | FMEA Table, Risk Priority, Mitigation Actions |
Tagsno overlap | Root causeQualityOperations | OutcomesInnovationResearchQuantitative | RiskRoot causeSafety | RiskQualityOperationsRoot cause |