methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper fishbone diagram with a measurable effect at the head and six labeled cause branches.
Operations
Fishbone Diagram
Gemba Walk workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
Operations
Gemba Walk
Software Architecture Canvas method illustration showing its working structure
Architecture
Software Architecture Canvas
Paper illustration for Failure Mode and Effects Analysis
Operations
Failure Mode and Effects Analysis
Purposedifferent
When a problem has several possible contributing factors, the method sorts causes by cause areas. It prevents an initial hunch from blocking the view of other plausible drivers.When there is uncertainty about the real course of a process, the method brings observation to the place where work happens. It combines perception, follow-up questions, and process knowledge so decisions rest on actual workflows instead of assumptions.The Software Architecture Canvas reduces a system to the most important architecture decisions, constraints, and interfaces. It is useful when teams need a resilient overall picture quickly.For a process, product, or service with noticeable failure risks, the method assesses possible failure modes in advance. It directs attention to combinations of occurrence, effect, and detectability.
Complexitydifferent
LowLowLowHigh
Timedifferent
30-60 min30-120 min1-2 h2-6 h
Participantsdifferent
2-82-63-103-10
Formatsame
WorkshopWorkshopWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Fishbone Diagram, Cause Categories, Investigation BacklogObservation Notes, Improvement IdeasArchitecture Canvas, Goals, Constraints, Quality AttributesFMEA Table, Risk Priority, Mitigation Actions
Tagsno overlap
Root causeQualityOperations
LeanObservationProcessOperations
CanvasArchitectureAlignmentWorkshop
RiskQualityOperationsRoot cause
Add more methods