methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Fault Tree Analysis.
Operations
Fault Tree Analysis
Paper illustration for Pareto Analysis
Decision Making
Pareto Analysis
Paper illustration of a calibrated five-by-five risk matrix with response cards.
Decision Making
Risk Matrix
Paper illustration for 8D Problem Solving.
Operations
8D Problem Solving
Purposedifferent
For a critical top event with several possible triggers, the method logically models failure paths. It makes visible which combinations of conditions can lead to damage.In many problem situations, effect is distributed unequally across many causes. A Pareto Analysis separates the few drivers with high leverage from the long remainder and focuses attention on what measurably moves the needle.When a project faces many possible disruptions, it quickly becomes unclear which risks deserve attention first. It separates options, evaluation criteria, and open risks. The result is captured as a Risk Matrix and a Top Risk List.For an acute quality or delivery problem, the method structures immediate protection and root cause work together. It keeps the situation stable while the actual cause is investigated cleanly.
Complexitydifferent
HighLowLowHigh
Timedifferent
2-6 h30-60 min30-60 min1-6 Wochen
Participantsdifferent
3-81-63-104-10
Formatsame
Workshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Fault Tree, Critical Paths, Cause Hypotheses, Control ActionsPareto Chart, Top Causes, Focus ListRisk Matrix, Top Risk List8D Report, Containment Plan, Root Cause Evidence, Corrective Action Plan
Tagsno overlap
RiskRoot causeSafety
PrioritizationQualityFocusRoot cause
RiskDecisionPrioritizationAssessment
QualityProblem solvingRoot cause
Add more methods