View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Operations Fault Tree Analysis | ![]() Agile Ideal Days | ![]() Operations 8D Problem Solving | ![]() Facilitation Dot Estimation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | For a critical top event with several possible triggers, the method logically models failure paths. It makes visible which combinations of conditions can lead to damage. | When effort needs to be thought of as real working time, it offers a simple common denominator for comparison. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as Ideal Day Estimates, Assumption Notes, and Capacity Caveats. | For an acute quality or delivery problem, the method structures immediate protection and root cause work together. It keeps the situation stable while the actual cause is investigated cleanly. | When size or effort can only be estimated roughly, Dot Estimation condenses the group's experience into a quick range. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as an Effort Heatmap, Risk Signals, and Discussion Targets. |
Complexitydifferent | High | Low | High | Low |
Timedifferent | 2-6 h | 15-60 min | 1-6 Wochen | 5-20 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-8 | 2-9 | 4-10 | 3-20 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Fault Tree, Critical Paths, Cause Hypotheses, Control Actions | Ideal Day Estimates, Assumption Notes, Capacity Caveats | 8D Report, Containment Plan, Root Cause Evidence, Corrective Action Plan | Effort Heatmap, Risk Signals, Discussion Targets |
Tagsno overlap | RiskRoot causeSafety | EstimationEffortAgile | QualityProblem solvingRoot cause | EstimationEffortRisk |



