View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Engineering Failure Scenario Analysis |  Innovation Crazy 8s |  Decision Making Pre-Mortem |  Innovation Brainstorming |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | In critical processes, it is not enough to plan only for the normal case. Failure Scenario Analysis looks at the path into failure and shows which failures, chains, and control gaps cause the most damage. | With only a few minutes available and a still-fuzzy solution search, the method forces a wide range of variants. It produces fast sketches before the first idea can settle in, making different directions directly comparable and open to further development. | In early initiatives with many uncertainties, planning quickly turns too optimistic. A pre-mortem makes the expected failure visible in advance and sharpens the view of causes, gaps, and countermeasures. | When a team faces an open question with many obvious directions, the method first creates breadth instead of premature commitment. It separates idea flow from evaluation and makes lines of thought visible, creating a pool for selection and further development. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 1-3 h | 8-15 min | 20–45 min | 30-60 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-8 | 1-10 | Small cross-functional group | 4-12 |
Formatsame | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Failure Scenarios, Risk Notes, Control Gaps, Test and Response Actions | Sketch Set, Idea Shortlist, Direction Options | Risk list, Mitigation plan, Assumption log | Idea pool, Theme clusters, Shortlist |
Tagsno overlap | FailureResilienceRisk | BrainstormingSketchingSpeedDivergenceDesign sprint | RiskDecisionFailurePlanning | BrainstormingIdeationCreativityWorkshopDivergence |