methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Failure Scenario Analysis.
Engineering
Failure Scenario Analysis
A paper-based illustration representing arc42 with its core stages and visible working result.
Architecture
arc42
Software Architecture Canvas method illustration showing its working structure
Architecture
Software Architecture Canvas
Paper illustration of two considered options leading to a decision record with a marked status and visible consequences.
Architecture
Architecture Decision Record
Purposedifferent
In critical processes, it is not enough to plan only for the normal case. Failure Scenario Analysis looks at the path into failure and shows which failures, chains, and control gaps cause the most damage.arc42 structures architecture knowledge so teams can document system, decisions, and risks consistently. The template builds a living understanding of the architecture instead of scattered notes.The Software Architecture Canvas reduces a system to the most important architecture decisions, constraints, and interfaces. It is useful when teams need a resilient overall picture quickly.An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable.
Complexitydifferent
MediumLowLowLow
Timedifferent
1-3 h1-2 Tage1-2 h15-45 min
Participantsdifferent
3-81-43-101-3
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshopAsync
Outputdifferent
Failure Scenarios, Risk Notes, Control Gaps, Test and Response ActionsArchitecture Document, Context View, Runtime View, Deployment ViewArchitecture Canvas, Goals, Constraints, Quality AttributesADR File, Decision Log, Rationale
Tagsno overlap
FailureResilienceRisk
ArchitectureDocumentationCommunication
CanvasArchitectureAlignmentWorkshop
ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance
Add more methods