methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Diary Study.
UX Research
Diary Study
Paper illustration for DACI
Decision Making
DACI
Software Architecture Canvas method illustration showing its working structure
Architecture
Software Architecture Canvas
Paper illustration of Request for Comments (RFC) with its method-specific working model.
Architecture
Request for Comments
Purposedifferent
When experiences build up over days or weeks and a single session cannot capture them, Diary Study records the course of everyday life. Recurring triggers, moods, and habits become visible this way, beyond the sharpness of memory.In cross-functional decisions, responsibilities quickly blur between approval, influence, and execution. DACI arranges these roles so decision pressure, contribution, and information stay cleanly separated.The Software Architecture Canvas reduces a system to the most important architecture decisions, constraints, and interfaces. It is useful when teams need a resilient overall picture quickly.An RFC clarifies architecture context, options, and consequences. It structures technical context, alternatives, tradeoffs, open questions, and review feedback, and captures the result as an RFC document, reviewer comments, and a decision rationale.
Complexitydifferent
MediumLowLowMedium
Timedifferent
1-4 Wochen30-60 min1-2 h1-3 Wochen vom Draft bis zur Entscheidung
Participantsdifferent
5-202-103-103-20 Reviewer
Formatdifferent
AsyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshopAsync
Outputdifferent
Diary Entries, Longitudinal Patterns, Experience TimelineDACI Matrix, Decision Owner, Decision LogArchitecture Canvas, Goals, Constraints, Quality AttributesRFC document, Reviewer comments, Decision rationale, Follow-up ADR or tickets
Tagsno overlap
UX researchTrackingBehavior
DecisionRolesGovernanceAlignment
CanvasArchitectureAlignmentWorkshop
ArchitectureDecisionAsyncGovernance
Add more methods