View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Decision Making Decision Matrix |  Business Strategy Three Horizons |  Product Strategy RICE Scoring |  Business Strategy Ansoff Matrix |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When several options collide with several criteria, comparison quickly becomes subjective. A Decision Matrix makes the trade-off visible and brings weighting, criteria, and options into a shared logic. | Three Horizons helps clarify strategic options across different timeframes. It compares strengths, risks, market logic, and investment choices, and captures the result as a horizon map, portfolio view, and initiatives per horizon. | When many initiatives compete for the same resources, it brings reach, impact, confidence, and effort into one shared ranking. It makes prioritization economically connectable. | The Ansoff Matrix organizes growth options by market and product relation. It helps weigh expansion, diversification, and adaptation cleanly against each other. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 45-90 min | Halbtags-Workshop, dann iterativ | 60-90 min | 45-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 2-8 | 3-12 | 2-10 | 2-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Decision Matrix, Scoring Rationale, Selected Option | Horizon map, Portfolio view, Initiatives per horizon, Resource plan | RICE Scores, Ranked List, Assumption Log | Ansoff Matrix, Growth Options, Risk Notes |
Tagsno overlap | DecisionCriteriaScoringTradeoffs | StrategyInnovationPortfolioForesight | PrioritizationScoringRoadmapTradeoffs | GrowthStrategyMarketPortfolio |