View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
Selected:DACIRequest for CommentsLASR (Lightweight Approach for Software Reviews)Decision Rights Mapping
| Criterion | ![]() Decision Making DACI | ![]() Architecture Request for Comments | ![]() Architecture LASR (Lightweight Approach for Software Reviews) | ![]() Decision Making Decision Rights Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | In cross-functional decisions, responsibilities quickly blur between approval, influence, and execution. DACI arranges these roles so decision pressure, contribution, and information stay cleanly separated. | An RFC clarifies architecture context, options, and consequences. It structures technical context, alternatives, tradeoffs, open questions, and review feedback, and captures the result as an RFC document, reviewer comments, and a decision rationale. | LASR helps development teams identify where their software falls short of important quality goals and which improvements to consider. A small group with existing system knowledge can make an initial assessment and investigate open questions in more detail. | In organizations with many stakeholders, it often blurs who actually decides and who is merely consulted. It separates options, evaluation criteria, and open risks. The result is captured as a Decision Rights matrix and an agreement. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 30-60 min | 1-3 Wochen vom Draft bis zur Entscheidung | 3–4 h for initial assessment; preparation and deeper analysis additional | 90-180 min |
Participantsdifferent | 2-10 | 3-20 Reviewer | 1 or a small team; particularly suitable for 3–4 people | 4-12 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Async | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | DACI Matrix, Decision Owner, Decision Log | RFC document, Reviewer comments, Decision rationale, Follow-up ADR or tickets | Lean Mission Statement describing the software’s purpose, Prioritized quality goals and evaluation criteria, Risks and estimated gaps against quality goals, More closely examined findings and open checks | Decision Rights Matrix, Agreement |
Tagsno overlap | DecisionRolesGovernanceAlignment | ArchitectureDecisionAsyncGovernance | ArchitectureQualityRiskAssessmentLean | DecisionGovernanceAlignmentResponsibility |



