methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Current Reality Tree
Systems Thinking
Current Reality Tree
Paper illustration of Counter Metrics with its method-specific working model.
Product Strategy
Counter Metrics
Paper illustration for Alignment Mapping.
Facilitation
Alignment Mapping
Paper illustration of KPI Tree with its method-specific working model.
Product Strategy
KPI Tree
Purposedifferent
A Current Reality Tree condenses many symptoms into a few causal chains. The method makes visible which core problems drive several negative effects at once.When a headline metric could mask side effects, it adds guardrail signals against unwanted outcomes. It connects customer value, product logic, and decision priorities. The result is captured as a counter-metric list and guardrail definitions.When several people work toward one goal but hold different mental maps, Alignment Mapping makes the discrepancies visible. It arranges goals, assumptions, and priorities so shared direction becomes verifiable.When metrics across the organization drift apart, it arranges drivers and effects under one shared logic. It connects customer value, product logic, and decision priorities. The result is captured as a KPI tree and owner list.
Complexitydifferent
HighLowMediumMedium
Timedifferent
2-6 h30-60 min1-2 h90-180 min initial, dann laufend
Participantsdifferent
3-82-64-123-8
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Current Reality Tree, Core Problems, Intervention IdeasCounter Metric List, Guardrail DefinitionsAlignment Map, Open Issues, Decision QuestionsKPI Tree, Owner List
Tagsno overlap
Systems thinkingRoot causeConstraintsCausality
MetricsMeasurementStrategyExperiments
AlignmentStakeholdersStrategyFacilitation
MetricsStrategyAlignmentMeasurement
Add more methods