View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Delivery Communication Plan |  Facilitation Lean Coffee |  Facilitation Power Interest Grid |  Delivery Shape Up |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When many people need to be informed in parallel and messages would otherwise arrive unevenly or too late, a Communication Plan orders communication reliably. Channels, audiences, and cadences interlock so important information doesn't get lost. | When a group without a fixed agenda needs to get into useful conversations quickly, Lean Coffee structures the start around interests rather than a presentation. The group itself negotiates which topics get time first and which wait. | When many stakeholders compete for attention at once, the Power Interest Grid sorts them by influence and stake. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as a Power Interest Grid and a stakeholder-specific strategy. | Shape Up helps clarify scope, sequence, and delivery flow. It makes work boundaries and decisions explicit and captures results as pitches, bet-table decisions, and hill charts. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Low | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 45-90 min | 30-90 min | 30-60 min | 6 Wochen Cycle + 2 Wochen Cool-Down |
Participantsdifferent | 2-6 | 3-20 | 2-8 | 2-4 pro Pitch |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Communication Plan, Channel Matrix, Message Cadence | Prioritized Topics, Discussion Notes, Action Items | Power Interest Grid, Strategy per Stakeholder | Pitches, Bet-table decisions, Hill charts, Cooldown outcomes |
Tagsno overlap | CommunicationStakeholdersDeliveryPlanning | FacilitationAutonomyDialogue | StakeholdersFacilitationAlignmentPlanning | PlanningDeliveryAutonomy |