View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Delivery Communication Plan | ![]() Facilitation Lean Coffee | ![]() Facilitation Alignment Mapping | ![]() Delivery Shape Up |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When many people need to be informed in parallel and messages would otherwise arrive unevenly or too late, a Communication Plan orders communication reliably. Channels, audiences, and cadences interlock so important information doesn't get lost. | When a group without a fixed agenda needs to get into useful conversations quickly, Lean Coffee structures the start around interests rather than a presentation. The group itself negotiates which topics get time first and which wait. | When several people work toward one goal but hold different mental maps, Alignment Mapping makes the discrepancies visible. It arranges goals, assumptions, and priorities so shared direction becomes verifiable. | Shape Up helps clarify scope, sequence, and delivery flow. It makes work boundaries and decisions explicit and captures results as pitches, bet-table decisions, and hill charts. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Low | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 45-90 min | 30-90 min | 1-2 h | 6 Wochen Cycle + 2 Wochen Cool-Down |
Participantsdifferent | 2-6 | 3-20 | 4-12 | 2-4 pro Pitch |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Communication Plan, Channel Matrix, Message Cadence | Prioritized Topics, Discussion Notes, Action Items | Alignment Map, Open Issues, Decision Questions | Pitches, Bet-table decisions, Hill charts, Cooldown outcomes |
Tagsno overlap | CommunicationStakeholdersDeliveryPlanning | FacilitationAutonomyDialogue | AlignmentStakeholdersStrategyFacilitation | PlanningDeliveryAutonomy |



