methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration showing three sorted card stacks and an open question about a possible group.
UX Research
Card Sorting
Paper illustration of Shape Up with its method-specific working model.
Delivery
Shape Up
Paper illustration of a branching category tree with a highlighted search path and possible dead ends.
UX Research
Tree Testing
Paper illustration for ALPEN Method
Operations
ALPEN Method
Purposedifferent
When content only makes sense internally and users can't find the structure again, card sorting exposes their mental order. Terms, groups, and naming are then aligned with the target group's expectations.Shape Up helps clarify scope, sequence, and delivery flow. It makes work boundaries and decisions explicit and captures results as pitches, bet-table decisions, and hill charts.When a navigation exists but search paths still fail, tree testing checks findability without visual distraction. The method shows whether labels, levels, and paths really lead to the intended destination.With an overloaded day full of too many tasks, a realistic picture of the day emerges. The method connects estimating, deciding, and buffer thinking so planning fits available energy and time.
Complexitydifferent
LowMediumMediumLow
Timedifferent
20-45 min6 Wochen Cycle + 2 Wochen Cool-Down1-2 Tage10-20 min daily
Participantsdifferent
Based on research question2-4 pro PitchBased on research question1
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncAsyncAsync
Outputdifferent
Content groups, Label set, IA hypothesesPitches, Bet-table decisions, Hill charts, Cooldown outcomesFindability Metrics, Path Analysis, Revised IADaily Plan, Time Estimates, Review Notes
Tagsno overlap
Information architectureNavigationStructure
PlanningDeliveryAutonomy
Information architectureNavigationFindability
PlanningTime managementProductivityOperations
Add more methods