methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Bottleneck Analysis.
Operations
Bottleneck Analysis
Paper illustration for PERT Estimation.
Decision Making
PERT Estimation
Paper illustration for 8D Problem Solving.
Operations
8D Problem Solving
Paper illustration for Current Reality Tree
Systems Thinking
Current Reality Tree
Purposedifferent
For a flow that backs up at one point, the method looks for the capacity limit with the greatest leverage. It explains why extra effort elsewhere barely improves throughput.On complex initiatives, a plain average tends to understate just how uncertain the outcome really is. It separates options, evaluation criteria, and open risks. The result is captured as a PERT Estimate, Expected Value, and Risk Notes.For an acute quality or delivery problem, the method structures immediate protection and root cause work together. It keeps the situation stable while the actual cause is investigated cleanly.A Current Reality Tree condenses many symptoms into a few causal chains. The method makes visible which core problems drive several negative effects at once.
Complexitydifferent
MediumMediumHighHigh
Timedifferent
1-3 h15-45 min1-6 Wochen2-6 h
Participantsdifferent
3-81-84-103-8
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Bottleneck Map, Flow Metrics, Improvement Options, Follow-up MeasuresPERT Estimate, Expected Value, Risk Notes8D Report, Containment Plan, Root Cause Evidence, Corrective Action PlanCurrent Reality Tree, Core Problems, Intervention Ideas
Tagsno overlap
FlowMeasurementConstraints
EstimationUncertaintyRisk
QualityProblem solvingRoot cause
Systems thinkingRoot causeConstraintsCausality
Add more methods