methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Bottleneck Analysis.
Operations
Bottleneck Analysis
Paper illustration for PDCA Cycle.
Operations
PDCA Cycle
Paper illustration of Counter Metrics with its method-specific working model.
Product Strategy
Counter Metrics
Paper illustration of HEART Framework with its method-specific working model.
UX Research
HEART Framework
Purposedifferent
For a flow that backs up at one point, the method looks for the capacity limit with the greatest leverage. It explains why extra effort elsewhere barely improves throughput.For an improvement that still has to prove itself in everyday work, the method runs it through small learning loops. It connects planning, checking, and standardization into a repeatable learning mode.When a headline metric could mask side effects, it adds guardrail signals against unwanted outcomes. It connects customer value, product logic, and decision priorities. The result is captured as a counter-metric list and guardrail definitions.Helps clarify observations, needs, and patterns in concrete terms. It groups observations into patterns, questions, and decisions. The result is captured as a HEART-GSM table and dashboard.
Complexitydifferent
MediumLowLowMedium
Timedifferent
1-3 h1 h bis mehrere Wochen30-60 min120 min initial, dann laufend
Participantsdifferent
3-81-82-63-6
Formatsame
Workshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Bottleneck Map, Flow Metrics, Improvement Options, Follow-up MeasuresPDCA Log, Experiment Plan, Learning Outcome, Standard ChangeCounter Metric List, Guardrail DefinitionsHEART-GSM Table, Dashboard
Tagsno overlap
FlowMeasurementConstraints
Continuous improvementLeanExperiments
MetricsMeasurementStrategyExperiments
MetricsUX researchMeasurementSatisfaction
Add more methods