methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Bottleneck Analysis.
Operations
Bottleneck Analysis
Paper illustration of HEART Framework with its method-specific working model.
UX Research
HEART Framework
Paper illustration of the Consensus Workshop working structure.
Facilitation
Consensus Workshop
Paper illustration of KPI Tree with its method-specific working model.
Product Strategy
KPI Tree
Purposedifferent
For a flow that backs up at one point, the method looks for the capacity limit with the greatest leverage. It explains why extra effort elsewhere barely improves throughput.Helps clarify observations, needs, and patterns in concrete terms. It groups observations into patterns, questions, and decisions. The result is captured as a HEART-GSM table and dashboard.When a group needs a solid decision without outvoting individual factions, a Consensus Workshop creates a negotiable common ground. It makes agreement, reservations, and open tensions discussable at the same time.When metrics across the organization drift apart, it arranges drivers and effects under one shared logic. It connects customer value, product logic, and decision priorities. The result is captured as a KPI tree and owner list.
Complexitysame
MediumMediumMediumMedium
Timedifferent
1-3 h120 min initial, dann laufend1-3 h90-180 min initial, dann laufend
Participantsdifferent
3-83-65-303-8
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Bottleneck Map, Flow Metrics, Improvement Options, Follow-up MeasuresHEART-GSM Table, DashboardConsensus Clusters, Theme Titles, Priority AreasKPI Tree, Owner List
Tagsno overlap
FlowMeasurementConstraints
MetricsUX researchMeasurementSatisfaction
FacilitationConsensusWorkshopAlignment
MetricsStrategyAlignmentMeasurement
Add more methods