methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of a two-by-two Ansoff Matrix with four growth directions
Business Strategy
Ansoff Matrix
Scenario Planning method illustration showing its working structure
Business Strategy
Scenario Planning
Paper illustration of Porter’s five competitive forces
Business Strategy
Porter Five Forces
Gap Analysis method illustration showing its working structure
Business Strategy
GAP Analysis
Purposedifferent
The Ansoff Matrix organizes growth options by market and product relation. It helps weigh expansion, diversification, and adaptation cleanly against each other.Scenario Planning opens the view to several plausible futures instead of a single forecast. The method protects strategies from depending on too narrow an expected path.Porter Five Forces analyzes the forces that shape competitive pressure and profitability in a market. The view of market structure goes beyond individual competitors and reveals systemic pressure points.GAP Analysis compares the current state with a target picture and makes the distance manageable. It becomes useful when, ahead of new initiatives, it must become clear which capabilities, processes, or resources are missing.
Complexitydifferent
LowHighMediumMedium
Timedifferent
45-90 min0.5-2 Tage1-3 h1-3 h
Participantsdifferent
2-84-122-82-8
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Ansoff Matrix, Growth Options, Risk NotesScenario Set, Strategic Implications, Robust OptionsFive Forces Analysis, Competitive Risks, Strategic OptionsGap Matrix, Action Plan, Risk Notes
Tags1 shared
GrowthStrategyMarketPortfolio
StrategyUncertaintyPlanning
StrategyCompetitionMarket
StrategyAnalysisPlanning
Add more methods