View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Facilitation Alignment Mapping | ![]() Growth North Star Metric | ![]() Facilitation Stakeholder Salience Model | ![]() Product Strategy KPI Tree |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When several people work toward one goal but hold different mental maps, Alignment Mapping makes the discrepancies visible. It arranges goals, assumptions, and priorities so shared direction becomes verifiable. | When product teams track many metrics, the view of the actual customer outcome easily gets lost. A North Star Metric bundles growth, usage, and value contribution into one signal that makes the system's direction visible. | When stakeholders appear to matter very differently, the Stakeholder Salience Model rates their actual priority through power, legitimacy, and urgency. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as a Salience diagram and a class-based strategy. | When metrics across the organization drift apart, it arranges drivers and effects under one shared logic. It connects customer value, product logic, and decision priorities. The result is captured as a KPI tree and owner list. |
Complexitysame | Medium | Medium | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 1-2 h | 1-2 h | 60-90 min | 90-180 min initial, dann laufend |
Participantsdifferent | 4-12 | 3-8 | 3-6 | 3-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Alignment Map, Open Issues, Decision Questions | North Star metric, Input metric tree, Measurement cadence | Salience Diagram, Strategy per Class | KPI Tree, Owner List |
Tags1 shared | AlignmentStakeholdersStrategyFacilitation | GrowthMetricsAlignmentRetention | StakeholdersFacilitationAlignmentGovernance | MetricsStrategyAlignmentMeasurement |



